United states of America

united states of america

Chapter 15 - Cross Border Insolvency Cases

In Re Al Zawawi No. 62021cv00894 - Document 28

Maxwell Communication Corp. ex rel. Homan v. Societe Generale (In re Maxwell Communication Corp.)

Samba v. Int_l Petroleum Prods. (In re Black Gold S.A.R.L.)

Debt embodied in a settlement agreement

Archer v. Warner, 538 U.S. 314 (2003)

Fair and equitable plan

Baker v. Gold Seal Liquors, Inc., 417 U.S. 467 (1974)

Persons Inelligible to Particiapate in the Debtors Reorganization

Bank of America Nat. Trust and Sav. Assn. v. 203 North LaSalle Street Partnership, 526 U.S. 434 (1999)

Reasonably equivalent value

Associates Commercial Corp. v. Rash, 520 U.S. 953 (1997)

BFP v. Resolution Trust Corp., 511 U.S. 531 (1994)

SCOTUS Landmark Cases on Title 11 U.S. Code

Archer v. Warner 538 U.S. 314 (2003)

(Dissent) - Archer v. Warner 538 U.S. 314 (2003)

(Opinion) - Archer v. Warner 538 U.S. 314 (2003)

Central VA Community College V. Katz (04-885) 546 U.S. 356 (2006)

(Dissent) - Central VA Community College V. Katz

(Opinion) - Central VA Community College V. Katz 546 U.S. 356 (2006)

FCC v. Nextwave Personal Communications Inc. (01-653) 537 U.S. 293 (2003)

(Concurrence) - FCC v. Nextwave Personal Comms Inc.

(Dissent) - FCC v. Nextwave Personal Comms Inc

(Opinion) - FCC v. Nextwave Personal Comms Inc

Florida Dept. of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias Inc.(No. 07-312)

(Dissent) - Florida Dept. of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias Inc

(Opinion) - Florida Dept. of Revenue v. Piccadilly Cafeterias Inc

Hamilton v. Lanning ( No. 08-998 )

(Dissent) - Hamilton v. Lanning ( No. 08-998 )

(Opinion) - Hamilton v. Lanning ( No. 08-998 )

Howard Delivery Service Inc. v. Zurich American Ins. Co. (No. 05-128)

(Dissent) - Howard Delivery Service Inc. v. Zurich American Ins. Co

(Opinion) - Howard Delivery Service Inc. v. Zurich American Ins. Co

Laime v. United States Trustee (02-693) 540 U.S. 526 (2004)

(Concurrence) - Laime v. United States Trustee (02-693)

(Opinion) - Laime v. United States Trustee (02-693)

Milavetz v. United States 559 U. S. (2010) ( Nos. 08-1119 and 08-1225 )

(Concurrence) - Milavetz v. United States 559 U.S. (2010)

(Opinion) - Milavetz v. United States 559 U. S. (2010)

Raymond B. Yates M.D. P.C. Profit Sharing Plan V. Hendon (02-458) 541 U.S. 1 (2004)

(Concurrence Scallia J.) - Raymond v. Hendons

(Concurrence Thomas J.) - Raymond v. Hendon

(Opinion) - Raymon v. Hendon

Schwab v. Reilly ( No. 08-538 )

(Dissent) - Schwab v. Reilly ( No. 08-538 )

(Opinion) - Schwab v. Reilly ( No. 08-538 )

Skilling v. United States ( No. 08-1394 )

(Concurrence Alito J.) - Skilling v. United States ( No. 08-1394 )

(Concurrence Bench)- Skilling v. United States ( No. 08-1394 )

(Opinion) - Skilling v. United States ( No. 08-1394 )

Stern v. Marshall 564 U.S. (2011)

(Concurrence) - Stern v. Marshall 564 U.S. (2011)

(Dissent) - Stern v. Marshall 564 U.S. (2011)

(Opinion) - Stern v. Marshall 564 U.S. (2011)

Tennessee Student Assistance Corporation v. Hood (02-1606) 541 U.S. 440 (2004)

(Concurrence) - Tennessee Student Assistance Corp v. Hood

(Dissent) - Tennessee Student Assistance Corporation v. Hood

(Opinion) - Tennessee Student Assistance Corporation v. Hood

Till V. SCS Credit Corp. (02-1016) 541 U.S. 465 (2004)

(Concurrence) - Till V. SCS Credit Corp

(Dissent) - Till V. SCS Credit Corp

(Opinion) - Till V. SCS Credit Corp

Travellers Indemnity Co. v. Bailey (Nos. 08-295 and 08-307)

(Dissent) - Travellers Indemnity Co. v. Bailey (Nos. 08-295 _ 08-307)

(Opinion) - Travellers Indemnity Co. v. Bailey (Nos. 08-295 and 08-307)

------------------------------------------------------------

(Opinion) - Raleigh v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue (99-387)

(Opinion) Kawaauhau v. Geiger (97-115)

Associates Commercial Corp. v. Rash, 520 U.S. 953 (1997)

Bank of American National Trust _ Savings Association. v. 203 North Lasalle Street Partnership (97-1418) 526 U.S. 434 (1999)

Beck v. Pace Int_l Union (No. 05-1448)

Celotex Corp. v. Edwards (93-1504), 514 U.S. 300 (1995)

Citizens Bank of Maryland v. Strumpf (94-1340), 516 U.S. 16 (1995)

Cohen v. de la Cruz (96-1923)

Fidelity Financial Services Inc v. Fink (96-1370)

Field et al. v. Mans (94-967), 516 U.S. 59 (1995)

Harris v. Brundage Co., 305 U.S. 160 (1938)

Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Union Planters Bank, N.A., 530 U.S. 1 (2000)

Hubbard v. United States (94-172), 514 U.S. 695 (1995)

ICC v. Transcon Lines (93-1318), 513 U.S. 138 (1995)

Jones v. Harris Assoicates L.P. ( No. 08-586 )

Kesler v. Department of Public Safety of Utah, 369 U.S. 153 (1962)

Kontrick v. Ryan (02-819)

Liebke v. Thomas, 116 U.S. 605 (1886)

Maislin Industries, U.S. v. Primary Steel (89-624), 497 U.S. 116 (1990)

Marrama Citizens Bank of Mass. (No. 05-996)

Oklahoma Tax Comm_n v. Jefferson Lines (93-1677), 514 U.S. 175 (1995)

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. The LTV Corp. (89-390), 496 U.S. 633 (1990)

Ransom v. FIA Card Services N. A. ( No. 09-907 )

Rivet v. Regions Bank of L.A. (96-1971)

Rousey v. Jacoway (03-1407) 544 U.S. 320 (2005)

SEC v. Edwards 300 F.3d 1281

Taylor v. Sturgell (No. 07-371)

Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca (94-1530), 516 U.S. 124 (1995)

Travellers Casualty Surety Co. v. Pacific Gas Elec. Co

Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. F.C.C. (95-992), 520 U.S. 180 (1997)

United States v. Bekins, 304 U.S. 27 (1938)

United States v. Galletti (02-1389) 541 U.S. 114 (2004)

United States v. Noland (95-323), 517 U.S. 535 (1996)

United States v. Reoganized CF I Fabricators Of Utah, Inc., et al. (95-325), 518 U.S. 213 (1996)

United Students Aid Funds Inc. v. Espinosa ( No. 08-1134 )

Young v. United States (00-1567) 535 U.S. 43 (2002)

Secured Claims

Bank of America, N. A. v. Caulkett, 575 U.S. 1 (2015)

Acknowledgment

The resources material has been collated by Insolvency Law Academy from multiple sources including from the websites of the multilateral organisations and international institutions, which have produced such rich content with the help of experts. Insolvency Law Academy takes no credit for this content. The material has only been organised to assist the insolvency fraternity with efficient research.